The Broken Economy and the Solutions

Restoring Economic Flow and Reducing Inequality in America

0:00

/1427.76

1×

Economic Inequality and Generational Wealth Transfer

The American tax system is structured to benefit the extremely wealthy while placing disproportionate burdens on middle-income earners. The system becomes regressive at the highest income levels, with those who derive income primarily from assets (stocks, real estate) paying significantly lower tax rates than high-earning professionals who rely on income.

This tax structure has created a "super class of billionaires" in America. Capital gains tax advantages and mortgage interest deductions primarily benefit older Americans who own stocks and property, while younger generations are largely excluded from these wealth-building mechanisms.

The wealth gap has widened dramatically along generational lines. The average 72-year-old American is approximately 7% wealthier than before, while Americans under 40 are 20% less wealthy. This represents a massive transfer of wealth from the young to the old, and from lower and middle classes to the extremely wealthy.

Broken Economic Mobility and Social Contract

For the first time in American history, 30-year-olds are not doing better economically than their parents did at the same age. This breakdown of generational progress represents a fundamental fracture in the American social contract and contributes to declining family formation and birthrates.

The percentage of 30-34 year-olds with children has dropped from 61% in 1990 to just 27% today. Young people are increasingly "opting out" of traditional life milestones, with declining rates of household formation and relationship building. The "pool of emotionally and economically viable men shrinks every day," exacerbating these demographic challenges.

Housing affordability has deteriorated dramatically, with average housing prices increasing from $290,000 to $420,000 in just four years. Combined with stagnant wages and inflation, young people's purchasing power continues to decline while they watch assets they don't own skyrocket in value.

Youth Disillusionment and Social Consequences

The economic pressures facing young Americans have created widespread disillusionment and anger. This underlies many current social movements, functioning as an "opportunistic infection" that can manifest in various forms of social unrest.

Social media exacerbates feelings of inadequacy among young people by constantly showcasing others' success. Every day, the message is "speedballed in their face that they are failing, not doing as well as everyone around them," fostering anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal.

There is particular concern about young men "sequestering from society" in their homes, substituting digital experiences for real-world social interaction. This has created what is described as "the most dangerous person in the world: a young, broke and lonely young man" who becomes vulnerable to conspiracy theories and antisocial behavior.

Education System Failures

Elite educational institutions perpetuate scarcity by taking "pride in rejecting 90% of applicants," artificially inflating the value of degrees while failing to prepare students for real-world challenges.

There is a critical gap in practical education. While students may learn advanced academic subjects like calculus, they lack understanding of basic financial literacy topics like credit card interest. Curriculum reforms are needed to include classes on "adulting," financial literacy, and even "mating dynamics."

The transition from civics education to computer science represents another problematic shift, as students gain technical skills but lose understanding of social systems and citizenship. Overall, the education system is failing to prepare young people with the basic skills they need to navigate economic and social realities.

Policy and Cultural Priorities

COVID relief efforts "flushed the markets" and drove asset prices higher, primarily benefiting existing asset holders at the expense of young people "on their credit card," referring to future debt burdens.

Housing policy issues are significant, with housing permits "sequestered from young people," contributing to artificial scarcity and unaffordable prices.

A deliberate policy choice has been made "to make sure people stay wealthy at the cost of young people," resulting in a generation that is "more anxious and depressed and obese and addicted" than previous ones.

Technology's Role in Social Isolation

Technology companies employ "the most talented people in the world" to convince young men they can have "a reasonable facsimile of life" through digital experiences rather than real-world interactions.

These technological substitutes remove the necessity for young people to develop social skills and resilience. "True victory in life is hard" and requires facing rejection and discomfort, but technology offers low-risk alternatives that ultimately prevent healthy development.

This particularly affects dating and relationships, with young men who "don't have the prospect of a romantic relationship" becoming "more prone to conspiracy theories" and antisocial behavior.

🔍 Context:

When the U.S. federal income tax system was created, "income" did not originally mean wages or salaries of the average worker. It was primarily intended to tax income derived from capital—like profits, dividends, rents, interest, and other gains.

📜 Historical Context:

1. Pre-1913 (Before the 16th Amendment):

• The U.S. tried income taxes during the Civil War and again in 1894.
• In Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. (1895), the Supreme Court struck down the 1894 income tax law, saying taxing income from property (like rent or dividends) was effectively a direct tax on property, which violated the Constitution unless apportioned by state population.

2. The 16th Amendment (1913):

"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment..."

• This clarified that income from any source—including investments, dividends, and rents—could be taxed without apportionment.
• The purpose was largely to tax the wealthy, whose "unearned income" (from capital) was growing fast.

🧾 Revenue Act of 1913 (First Modern Tax Code):

• After the 16th Amendment, the Revenue Act of 1913 was passed.
• The law defined taxable income to include:
  • Gains or profits from any source, including business, property, investments.
  • Wages and salaries were included—but were not the primary target.
• At the time, only the wealthiest ~3% of Americans paid any income tax.

⚖️ Supreme Court Interpretation:

Eisner v. Macomber (1920):

“Income may be defined as the gain derived from capital, from labor, or from both combined, provided it be understood to include profit gained through a sale or conversion of capital assets.”

• This ruling shows a clear focus on gain, profit, and derivation, not just wages.
• Income is not merely "what you’re paid"—it’s what you gain after a transaction or effort.

🧠 Insights:

• “Income” = Net gain, not simply gross wages.
• The original intent of the income tax was to capture wealth accumulation, especially among the capital class.
• Over time, the IRS broadened enforcement and Congress amended laws, eventually making wages/salaries the primary source of taxable income for the majority of Americans.

✅ Answer to Your Core Question:

When the IRS tax code was created, “income” was originally defined to include profits and gains, especially from capital and investments. It did not exclusively or even primarily mean a working person’s wages or salary. That interpretation evolved over time, particularly during and after World War II, when mass taxation of wages became standard.

📘 The Evolution of “Income” in U.S. Tax Law (Chronological Overview)

1861–1872: Civil War Income Tax (Temporary)

• Why: To fund the Civil War.
• What it taxed: Included wages, dividends, rents, and profits.
• Notable point: This was a temporary measure—expired in 1872.
• Impact: First federal income tax, but not yet a permanent policy.

1894: The Wilson-Gorman Tariff Act

• What it did: Reintroduced a 2% income tax on incomes over $4,000 (about $135,000 today).
• Who it affected: Only the wealthy.
• Legal outcome: In Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust (1895), the Supreme Court struck it down, ruling that income from property (like interest and rent) was a direct tax and unconstitutional without apportionment.

1913: 16th Amendment

“Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived…”

• Purpose: To override the Pollock decision.
• Key change: Allowed federal income tax without apportionment across states.
• Scope: Opened the door to taxing profits, dividends, capital gains, and salaries alike.
• Political environment: Progressive Era—strong push to tax the wealthy and reduce inequality.

1913: Revenue Act of 1913

• Structure:
  • 1% tax on income over $3,000.
  • Higher rates for wealthier Americans (up to 7%).
• Definition of “income”:
  • “Net income” from labor (wages), business, property, interest, dividends, and gains.
• Real effect: ~3% of Americans paid income tax.
• Key theme: Focus was on the rich and investment-derived income.

1920: Eisner v. Macomber

“Income” is a gain derived from capital, labor, or both combined... must involve realized gain.

• Impact: Strengthened the definition of “income” as gain, not mere ownership of appreciated assets.
• Political context: Attempt to prevent taxes on unrealized gains like stock dividends.

1930s: Great Depression & New Deal Era

• Revenue Acts (1932, 1934, 1935):
  • Raised income tax rates significantly.
  • Expanded brackets to include middle-class and working-class Americans.
• Political goal: Fund New Deal programs and redistribute wealth.
• Key change: “Income” was now more aggressively applied to salaries and wages, not just profits.

1942: Revenue Act of 1942 (WWII Era)

Called by FDR “the greatest tax bill in American history.”

• Changes:
  • Dramatically expanded income tax to the mass population.
  • Introduced withholding tax system for salaries and wages.
• Who paid: ~60% of Americans now paid income tax.
• Definition shift: “Income” now practically meant everyone’s wages, not just wealth-based earnings.
• Political context: Needed massive funding for World War II.

1954: Internal Revenue Code of 1954

• Formalization: First major codification of the tax code.
  • Including wages, rents, dividends, interest, gains, royalties, alimony, etc.
• Key point: Income = accessions to wealth, regardless of source.

Definition of gross income:

“All income from whatever source derived…” (Section 61)

1980s: Reagan Tax Reforms (Supply-Side Economics)

• Economic Recovery Tax Act (1981) and Tax Reform Act of 1986:
  • Reduced top income tax rates.
  • Closed many tax loopholes and shelters for investment income.
  • Broadened the base: more wage earners paid tax, but rates were lowered.
• Political rationale: Encourage investment and economic growth via "trickle-down" theory.
• Impact on “income”: Widened enforcement to ensure wage earners contributed a larger portion of tax revenue.

2000s–2020s: Increasing Use of Payroll Tax

• Trend: A growing share of government revenue comes from FICA taxes (for Social Security and Medicare), which only apply to wage income, not investment income.
• Criticism: Creates a regressive effect, where wage earners pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes than wealthy investors.
• Political debate: Whether to tax capital gains like wages, raise top marginal rates, or impose wealth taxes.

🧠 Key Insights

1. Original Intent (Pre-WWII):
   • Income tax was created to target capital gains, rents, dividends, and profits—i.e., wealth-based “unearned” income.
   • Wages were a secondary focus, with very few workers paying tax.
2. Shift During WWII:
   • Policy and enforcement expanded to include nearly all workers.
   • Withholding from wages became standard.
3. Post-War Onward:
   • “Income” became synonymous with wages for most Americans.
   • Wealthy individuals still benefited from lower rates on capital gains and wealth exemptions.
4. Modern Critique:
   • Many argue that this shift violated the original intent of the income tax.
   • Others see it as a necessary adaptation to fund an expanding state.

The U.S. Socioeconomic Breakdown:

How We Got Here, Why It’s Failing, and How to Fix It

I. 📉 The Current State: A System Rigged for the Wealthy

The American economic system has evolved into a wealth-preservation machine for elites, while systematically excluding younger and middle-income Americans from long-term prosperity.

• Income taxes are progressively structured on paper but function regressively in practice at the highest levels.
• Capital income (like stocks and real estate) is taxed at lower effective rates than earned wages, benefiting those who already own assets.
• Generational divides are stark: the wealth of older Americans rises, while younger generations see declining purchasing power, savings, and stability.

This is not accidental—it is the product of deliberate policy choices.

II. 🏛️ How the System Got This Way

1. Tax Policy Drift: From Progressive to Protective

• The original income tax (1913) was designed to tax the richest Americans—primarily unearned income (capital gains, dividends, rents).
• World War II-era expansions brought the working class into the tax base via withholding taxes, while capital owners retained favorable treatment.
• Over the 20th century, capital gains tax rates were cut, estate taxes weakened, and corporate loopholes widened.

Logic: Wages became easier to tax due to automatic payroll systems; capital gains remained complex and politically protected by wealthy lobbies.

2. Asset Inflation Over Labor Wages

• Policies like low interest rates, quantitative easing, and housing incentives inflated asset values (stocks, homes).
• These policies increased the wealth of existing asset owners but left out those without capital—namely, young people and renters.

3. Weakened Social Safety Nets and Mobility Infrastructure

• Over decades, public universities became more expensive, civic institutions lost funding, and job security weakened (gig economy, contract work).
• This created a two-tier society: those with inheritance and connections vs. those without.

III. ⚠️ The Failures: Why the Current System is Collapsing

1. The Death of the American Dream

• For the first time, younger Americans are worse off than their parents in wealth, income, and stability.
• This breaks the social contract that once promised upward mobility in exchange for hard work and education.

Result: Fewer families, fewer children, rising disillusionment.

2. Psychosocial Collapse Among Youth

• Digital lifestyles, poor job prospects, and housing unaffordability leave many young men in isolation, vulnerable to radicalization, addiction, and despair.
• The illusion of connection via social media replaces meaningful relationships.

"The most dangerous person in the world is a broke, lonely, young man."
This is not rhetoric—it’s a predictive social pattern in failing societies.

3. Education: High Cost, Low Relevance

• Colleges compete on prestige scarcity (low acceptance rates) rather than real-world preparedness.
• Financial literacy, civic knowledge, and emotional skills are not taught, leaving graduates intellectually sophisticated but practically unprepared.

IV. 🛠️ How to Fix It: Systemic and Cultural Overhaul

A. Tax Reform: Equalizing the Playing Field

1. Tax capital like labor: Align capital gains rates with income tax brackets.
2. Close estate tax loopholes: Eliminate dynastic wealth pipelines.
3. Introduce a wealth tax: Tax extreme net worth to fund public reinvestment.
4. Expand EITC and child credits: Directly raise working-class incomes.

Rationale: True fairness requires taxing wealth, not just work. This can reverse the compounding advantage of generational capital.

B. Housing Affordability and Land Use Reform

1. End exclusionary zoning: Allow multi-unit dwellings in high-opportunity zones.
2. Federal housing vouchers: For all renters below a set income threshold.
3. Build publicly owned housing: Not "projects," but mixed-income, dignified units.

Rationale: Housing scarcity is artificial. Deregulating permits and public investment would re-enable young people to build stable lives.

C. Education Redesign

1. Civics, financial literacy, and “life skills” in high school core curriculum.
2. Free community college and trade schools: Broaden access to upward mobility.
3. Admissions lottery for qualified candidates: End prestige-driven exclusivity.

Rationale: Empower citizens, not just test-takers. Education should restore civic competence and economic resilience.

D. Cultural Reset: Technology, Masculinity, and Connection

1. Tech accountability: Regulate algorithms that prey on addiction and anxiety.
2. Fund mentorship and rites-of-passage programs: Especially for boys and young men.
3. Rebuild public life: Parks, libraries, community centers, and sports programs.

Rationale: A functioning society needs connection, not consumption. Resilience must be taught, not assumed.

V. 🚀 The Path Forward: Restoring the Social Contract

The solution is not nostalgia. It’s modernization with moral clarity:

• Economics must value labor, not just capital.
• Education must prepare citizens, not just workers.
• Policy must serve the living, not preserve the past.
• Culture must reward real-world courage, not digital posturing.

If America commits to this realignment—of tax codes, education, housing, and culture—it can repair the social contract, rebuild economic mobility, and avert the dangers of a society where the young are dispossessed, disillusioned, and disconnected.

💡 Summary: Fixing Economic Dysfunction via Chartalism, MMT, and the Cantillon Effect

🏛️ Chartalism: Money Is a Creation of the State

Core Principle:

Money has value because the government accepts it for taxes. It is not commodity-based but a legal construct.

🔍 Implications for Reform:

• The U.S. government, as the issuer of currency, is not financially constrained in the way households or states are.
• Taxation’s real role is to regulate inflation and direct behavior, not to fund spending.

✅ Policy Solutions:

1. Targeted spending into underperforming areas (public housing, health, education) to direct money into the real economy—not just financial assets.
2. Tax unproductive capital (like stock buybacks and passive real estate holdings) to reduce inflationary pressure and redirect capital flow.

Solves: The myth of “we can’t afford it” while acknowledging the need to tax to maintain price stability and productive flow.

💸 MMT: Public Spending as a Tool for Full Employment and Growth

Core Principle:

Government deficits are not inherently bad—they are private sector surpluses. What matters is where the money goes.

🔍 Implications for Reform:

• The problem is not money creation but money distribution.
• A dollar in the hands of the poor is spent; in the hands of the wealthy, it is hoarded.

✅ Policy Solutions:

1. Federal Job Guarantee: Direct employment for anyone willing to work in socially valuable roles (e.g., infrastructure, care economy).
2. Universal basic services (education, housing, transport, childcare) rather than just UBI, to ensure spending reaches the real economy.
3. Dynamic deficit targeting: Use government spending to increase velocity of money, especially in low-income communities.

Solves: The chronic underconsumption problem by injecting money into sectors with high marginal propensity to consume (MPC).

🧮 Cantillon Effect: Who Gets the Money First Matters

Core Principle:

When new money is introduced into the economy, those closest to its source (e.g., banks, corporations, asset holders) benefit first—before inflation kicks in.

🔍 Implications for Reform:

• Post-2008 and especially post-2020, QE and stimulus flowed to asset markets (stocks, housing), enriching the wealthy.
• The poor, who receive money last or not at all, face the inflation without the wealth boost.

✅ Policy Solutions:

1. Flip the pipeline: Direct government spending first to consumers, workers, and small producers rather than financial institutions.
2. Public credit facilities for cooperatives and small businesses rather than big banks.
3. Asset ownership democratization: Expand access to public investment accounts, housing co-ops, and employee stock ownership.

Solves: The structural inequality baked into traditional monetary policy, by front-loading benefits to those most affected by inflation.

🔄 Solving Near-Zero Velocity of Money (2020 Crisis)

Velocity of Money = The rate at which money changes hands in the economy.

• Dropped to historic lows in 2020 due to:
  • Concentration of wealth (money hoarded, not spent)
  • Shutdowns, uncertainty, and lack of productive investment
  • Asset-price inflation substituting for productive activity

🛠 Practical Fixes:

• Inject liquidity into high-MPC demographics (low-income workers, renters, students) to get money circulating quickly.
• Ban or heavily tax idle financial practices like buybacks and short-term asset flipping.
• Public works and local investment programs that keep money circulating regionally, rather than concentrating in corporate HQs or hedge funds.

Bottom Line: Money must move to matter. Otherwise, it becomes a static symbol of inequality, not a tool of growth.

✅ Conclusion: Systemic Economic Redesign

Through Chartalism, we accept that the government creates money and must steer its purpose.
Through MMT, we learn that spending and deficits are tools—not threats—when managed responsibly.
Through the Cantillon Effect, we see that distribution matters more than creation.

To restore economic health:

• Spend at the bottom where velocity is high.
• Tax and regulate at the top where hoarding and inflation risk arise.
• Engineer systemic flow, not static wealth pools.

If money moves, society thrives. If money is hoarded, society fractures.