Sign in Subscribe

Topic

Justice

A collection of 9 issues

DISSENT OF THE PEOPLE Trump v. CASA

The People of the United States issue a moral dissent against the Supreme Court's restriction of nationwide injunctions, defending constitutional rights and birthright citizenship using John Adams’ "Moral Algorithm" as a guiding principle for justice for all.

Executive Overreach and the Erosion of Legal Independence

Trump’s March 27 EO targets law firm WilmerHale, citing political bias and national security risks. This analysis finds the order undermines legal independence, weaponizes government power, and fails ethical, civic, and economic justice tests. What kind of society does this produce?

Presidential Authority vs. Judicial Oversight

The situation raises fundamental questions about separation of powers, executive authority, and the role of judicial review in American governance.

Dismantling Federal DEI Programs

The proposed Executive Order to eliminate Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs across federal agencies represents more than just a policy shift—it threatens decades of progress in building a federal workforce that truly reflects and serves all Americans

Reversing Civil Rights

This appears to be a coordinated assault on civil rights achievements spanning decades, Trump and corporate America have launched what can only be described as an all-out war against minorities.

Trumps Immigration EO vs Moral Algorithm

Section-by-Section Analysis of PAPAI under the Moral Algorithm and Veil of Ignorance

A Dialogue on Reversing Neoliberalism

a fictional dialogue between John Adams, John Rawls, and Aristotle, exploring how to reverse neoliberalism's effects on American democracy.

Analysis of Trump's Sentencing

By examining the judge's precise words and contextualizing the statements, this document seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of the legal rationale and the broader implications of the trial.

Ethical Violations at the Supreme Court

Recent investigations have unveiled a troubling pattern of ethical violations among some of its justices, jeopardizing the institution's integrity.