Compassion Over Coercion A Policy for Connection

0:00

/959.64

1×

A Call for Connection Over Coercion

Dear President Trump,

Your July 24, 2025 executive order "Ending Crime and Disorder on America's Streets" represents a profound moral failure and a dangerous return to policies that have been proven ineffective for over a century. As an ethical analyst who has studied both the philosophical underpinnings of justice and the empirical evidence on addiction and homelessness, I write to you with urgency about the catastrophic consequences of your approach.

The Order's Fundamental Misunderstanding

Your executive order authorizes forced institutionalization, criminalizes poverty, and frames homelessness as primarily a matter of public disorder rather than human suffering. You cite statistics showing that 274,224 individuals experience homelessness on any given night, and that many struggle with addiction or mental illness. Yet your response is to hide these human beings from view rather than address the root causes of their suffering.

Let me be clear: The opposite of addiction is not sobriety. The opposite of addiction is connection.

What Science Actually Tells Us About Addiction

Your order rests on a century-old misunderstanding of addiction that has been thoroughly debunked by modern research. The "chemical hook" theory - that drugs contain substances that inevitably create physical dependency - has been disproven by multiple lines of evidence:

The Medical Contradiction

Every day in American hospitals, patients receive diamorphine - pharmaceutical-grade heroin - for pain management after surgeries and injuries. This medical heroin is purer and more potent than anything available on the streets. Yet these patients, including elderly individuals recovering from hip replacements, do not emerge as addicts despite prolonged exposure. If addiction were simply about chemical hooks, our hospitals would be creating addicts by the thousands.

The Rat Park Revolution

Professor Bruce Alexander's groundbreaking experiments revealed that environment, not chemistry, drives addiction. When rats were placed in enriched environments with social connections, stimulation, and purpose - "Rat Park" - they showed virtually no interest in drug-laced water, even when freely available. The overdose rate dropped from nearly 100% in isolated cages to 0% in connected environments.

The Vietnam War Evidence

Perhaps most compelling is the natural experiment of the Vietnam War. Twenty percent of American troops used heroin in Vietnam. Yet upon returning home, 95% simply stopped using without treatment or rehabilitation. They didn't need forced institutionalization - they needed to come home to connections, purpose, and opportunity.

The Portuguese Model: Evidence-Based Success

While you propose punishment and institutionalization, Portugal provides a real-world example of what actually works. Facing Europe's worst drug crisis in 2000, Portugal took the opposite approach:

• Decriminalized all drugs
• Redirected resources from punishment to reconnection
• Created massive job programs for people with addiction
• Provided microloans for small businesses
• Offered wage subsidies to employers who hired people in recovery

The results after 15 years:

• 50% reduction in problematic drug use
• Massive decreases in overdoses and HIV infections
• Significant reduction in addiction rates
• Strong public support - almost no one wants to return to the punitive system

Portugal recognized that people need something to get out of bed for in the morning beyond the threat of punishment.

Your Policy Fails Every Ethical Test

John Adams' Moral Algorithm

Adams envisioned governance that promotes the common good and reforms injustice. Your policy:

• Serves the comfort of property owners over the dignity of the unhoused
• Entrenches the criminalization of poverty
• Replaces failed systems with coercive ones rather than restorative ones

Rawls' Veil of Ignorance

No rational person, not knowing their future circumstances, would choose a system that could forcibly institutionalize them for experiencing homelessness. Your policy strips liberty from the most vulnerable while offering no real path to housing or autonomy.

Aristotelian Virtue Ethics

A just society cultivates human flourishing through virtues like compassion and justice. Your policy reflects fear and control, not virtue. It treats human beings as problems to be hidden rather than fellow citizens deserving dignity.

The Economic Fallacy and Racial Targeting

From a Modern Monetary Theory perspective, your approach represents a catastrophic misallocation of resources. A sovereign currency issuer like the United States can afford to fund comprehensive housing, healthcare, and support services. Instead, you choose to channel resources toward prisons, police, and institutional systems - the most expensive and least effective interventions possible.

The Cantillon Effect shows us that where money enters the economy matters. Your policy injects resources at the level of enforcement and control, benefiting institutional systems while the homeless bear all the burden.

The Grotesque Funding Disparity

The true priorities of your administration are laid bare in the budget numbers:

For Immigration Enforcement:

• $168-170 billion allocated in your "One Big Beautiful Bill" for border enforcement
• $75 billion for ICE over four years - a 300% increase
• $46.5 billion for a border wall
• $608 million for state-run migrant detention centers
• $232 million for a single 5,000-person detention camp in Texas

For Homelessness:

• A mere $4.9 billion requested by advocates for HUD's Homeless Assistance Grants
• Your administration actually proposes CUTS to homeless services
• Housing vouchers underfunded by $3.7 billion
• Total federal spending on homelessness: less than 3% of what you spend on detention

You are spending over 35 times more on caging immigrants than on housing the homeless. This is not fiscal responsibility - it's moral bankruptcy.

The Racial Architecture of Your Policy

Your order doesn't exist in a vacuum - it's part of a broader system of racialized control that targets Black, Indigenous, and people of color disproportionately. Let's be clear about what "whiteness" really is and how your policies weaponize it.

The Construction of Whiteness as Control

"Whiteness" as a concept did not exist in nature or in early human societies - it was deliberately constructed as a political and economic tool to serve imperial and colonial purposes. Prior to the colonial period, people identified themselves by nationality, religion, tribe, or region, not by broad racial categories. The concept of "whiteness" was manufactured to create artificial hierarchies that justified exploitation and domination.

Your executive order continues this tradition by:

• Criminalizing poverty in ways that disproportionately impact communities of color
• Using "public safety" as a coded appeal to white suburban fears
• Channeling resources toward enforcement rather than support
• Creating systems that push people of color into institutional control

Who Really Experiences Homelessness

The data exposes the racial targeting inherent in your approach:

• Black Americans represent 13% of the U.S. population but 37% of the homeless
• Indigenous peoples are chronically overrepresented in homeless populations
• Latino communities face increasing homelessness due to housing discrimination
• LGBTQ youth of color face the highest rates of youth homelessness

Your policy doesn't address these disparities - it weaponizes them. By criminalizing homelessness, you're creating a pipeline from the streets to jails that will disproportionately capture Black and Brown bodies.

The Historical Echo

Your approach eerily mirrors the vagrancy laws of the post-Civil War era - laws explicitly designed to re-enslave Black Americans through the criminal justice system. Like those laws, your order:

• Criminalizes the existence of poor people of color in public spaces
• Uses vague terms like "disorder" to justify broad enforcement
• Channels people into forced institutional control
• Prioritizes the comfort of white property owners over human dignity

Modern Disconnection and Digital Addiction

We live in an age of unprecedented disconnection. The average American has fewer close friends than at any point since the 1950s. We've traded human connections for digital interfaces, community for isolation. Many people's lives now resemble the isolated rat cage rather than the connected environment of Rat Park.

In this context, your policy doesn't just fail to address homelessness - it actively worsens the disconnection crisis that drives addiction and despair in the first place.

The Real Solutions Already Exist

The evidence is clear on what actually works:

1. Housing First - Provide stable housing without preconditions
2. Universal Healthcare - Including comprehensive mental health services
3. Guaranteed Income or Employment - Give people purpose and dignity
4. Harm Reduction - Meet people where they are with compassion
5. Community Integration - Foster connections, not isolation

These aren't radical ideas. They're evidence-based practices that have succeeded wherever genuinely implemented.

The Weaponization of Christianity Against the Vulnerable

Your invocation of Christian values while implementing this cruel policy represents a profound theological perversion. Christianity, as you wield it, becomes not a source of compassion but a tool of oppression - exactly as it was used during slavery, colonization, and segregation.

The Jesus of the Gospels said:

• "Whatever you do unto the least of these, you do unto me"
• "Blessed are the poor"
• "It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter heaven"

Yet your policy:

• Punishes the poor for their poverty
• Forcibly institutionalizes "the least of these"
• Protects property over people
• Uses suffering as a tool of social control

This is not Christianity - it's the worship of power dressed in religious language. It's the same perversion that justified slavery with Bible verses and genocide with missionary work.

The Personal and the Political

I think of the reality show "Intervention," where families threaten to cut off all connection unless the person with addiction complies with specific demands. Your policy imports this failed logic to the national level. But the evidence shows we need the opposite approach - deepening connection, not threatening disconnection.

The Portuguese model teaches us to say: "I love you whether you're using or not. I love you whatever state you're in. If you need me, I'll come and sit with you because I love you and I don't want you to be alone."

A Call to Conscience

Mr. President, you have a choice. You can continue down the path of punishment, institutionalization, and disconnection - a path that has failed for 100 years. Or you can embrace what the evidence actually shows: that connection heals, that purpose motivates, that dignity transforms.

The 274,224 Americans experiencing homelessness tonight are not statistics or problems to be solved through force. They are human beings who deserve the same thing we all need: connection, purpose, and the chance to be fully present in their own lives.

The Moral Reckoning

History will remember this moment. It will remember whether we chose to spend $170 billion building cages or homes. It will remember whether we saw poverty as a crime or a policy failure. It will remember whether we treated addiction as a moral failing or a health crisis.

Most importantly, it will remember whether we recognized the humanity in every person - regardless of their housing status, their struggles with addiction, or the color of their skin.

Immediate Actions Required

I urge you to:

1. Withdraw this executive order immediately
2. Redirect the $170 billion allocated for detention toward:
   • Permanent supportive housing
   • Universal healthcare including mental health services
   • Living wage job programs
   • Community-based addiction treatment
3. Implement Housing First policies nationwide
4. End the criminalization of poverty and addiction
5. Acknowledge and address the racial disparities in both homelessness and enforcement

The choice is yours, but history will judge harshly those who choose cruelty over compassion when the evidence for what works is so clear.

Until we recognize that the opposite of addiction is connection, we will continue to fail our most vulnerable citizens. Until we understand that homelessness is a policy choice, not an inevitable tragedy, we will continue to perpetuate suffering. Until we see that "whiteness" was constructed to divide us, we cannot build the beloved community we all deserve.

The time for war songs is over. It's time to sing love songs to those who need them most.

Respectfully but urgently,

Ethical Analysis Correspondent

P.S. To those implementing this order: You have a moral obligation to resist policies that harm the vulnerable. History remembers not just those who give orders, but those who choose to follow them. The Nuremberg Defense - "I was just following orders" - has been rejected by every moral framework. Choose conscience over compliance.