Hidden Laws Destroying Food Safety and Hemp

0:00

/610.359728

1×

The "Clean" Continuing Resolution: A Case Study in Democratic Failure

Executive Summary

Despite being characterized repeatedly by Republican leadership as a "clean continuing resolution" with "no backroom deals, no secret programs or partisan anything," the government funding bill passed in early 2025 contained numerous provisions unrelated to government operations that were added anonymously and passed without proper legislative review. This bill represents a textbook example of how democratic governance fails when legislators abandon the founding principle of deliberation before legislation, passing laws they have not read, containing provisions the public did not debate, serving interests that were never disclosed.

The implications extend far beyond this single piece of legislation. When lawmakers pass bills without reading them, when provisions are added anonymously to must-pass legislation, when the democratic process becomes a vehicle for hidden agendas rather than public deliberation, the entire system of self-governance breaks down. This is not a partisan failure; it is a systemic one that exposes the crisis at the heart of American democracy: the abandonment of the educational and procedural foundations that make legitimate lawmaking possible.

The Framing and the Reality

The Public Narrative

Republican leadership consistently characterized the continuing resolution as straightforward government funding legislation. The framing emphasized:

• Characterized as "just business as usual" for government operations
• Described as maintaining "the status quo" without changes
• Primary public debate focused on extending Affordable Care Act subsidies
• Later debate centered on Trump using SNAP (food assistance) as leverage to force Democratic cooperation
• Eventually signed by Trump as "this incredible bill" that would "get our country working again"
• Democratic leadership agreed to the bill under this framing

The Hidden Reality

The bill contained what can only be described as "poison pills" -provisions so problematic that they were compared to having "enough poison pills to pull a Jonestown." These additions were:

• Added anonymously without attribution to specific legislators
• Inserted at the last minute without debate
• Hidden within must-pass legislation to avoid scrutiny
• Not discovered until days after passage
• Still not fully covered by mainstream media as of the reporting

Non-Budget Provisions Added to the Continuing Resolution

Provision 1: Senator Legal Protection and Retroactive Lawsuit Rights

What It Does:

The bill makes it a violation of federal law for the government to fail to notify a senator if their phone records or other metadata are obtained from service providers (phone companies, telecommunications companies, etc.) during investigations.

The Retroactive Element:

The provision was made retroactive to 2022, which means it applies to past actions by investigators. This specifically covers the eight Republican senators whose phone records were subpoenaed by Special Counsel Jack Smith during his investigation into Donald Trump's efforts to obstruct the certification of the 2020 presidential election results.

Financial Implications:

• Each violation carries a penalty of at least $500,000 in any legal claim
• The eight senators whose records were obtained could each file lawsuits claiming violations
• This means hundreds of thousands of dollars in potential payouts to these senators from American taxpayers
• The bill language "sharply limits" how the government can resist such claims
• Specifically removes qualified immunity and sovereign immunity defenses that would normally protect the government from such lawsuits

The Anonymity Problem:

The provision was added anonymously, no legislator has claimed authorship or responsibility for inserting this language. As noted in the analysis: "We don't know which Republican added this in, but I have at least eight we should look at first", referring to the eight senators who would directly benefit financially.

Legislative Response:

Representative John Rose (R) introduced a separate bill to repeal this provision, stating: "I just introduced a bill to repeal the Senate's last-minute provision allowing senators to sue American taxpayers over Biden DOJ investigations, past or future. Two wrongs don't make a right."

However, this was characterized as an "empty gesture" because Rose voted for the CR containing the provision in the first place. The separate repeal bill failed.

Republican Criticism:

Even some Republicans acknowledged the absurdity of senators being able to sue the United States government for what was described as "an obviously legal investigation."

Provision 2: Food Safety Deregulation

Investigative Source:

This provision was uncovered through investigative reporting by David Sirota and The Lever, described as a "scoop" that mainstream media had not yet covered. The headline from The Lever read: "Shutdown Deal Kills Food Safety Rules."

Context and Timing:

The provision was inserted "amid an explosion of foodborne illnesses" occurring across the United States, making the timing particularly problematic from a public health perspective.

Specific Rules Blocked:

The legislation blocks federal enforcement of multiple food safety regulations:

A. Traceability Requirements (2022 Rule):

• Blocks enforcement of recordkeeping standards for food companies
• These standards were designed to help federal agencies identify the origin of foodborne illness outbreaks
• The rule was published on November 21, 2022
• The provision states: "no funds may be used to administer or enforce the requirements for additional traceability records for certain foods"
• This effectively makes the 2022 law unenforceable by cutting funding for its administration

B. Agricultural Inspection Standards (2015 FDA Rule - Page 133):

• Blocks enforcement of stricter inspections for wine grapes, hops, almonds, and certain other crops
• These inspections were established to maintain quality and safety standards
• The rule established water quality standards for irrigating produce
• Set hygienic practices for farm workers to limit produce contamination
• Makes it easier for alcohol production to use contaminated water

C. High-Sodium Food Tracking:

• Makes it harder to track and regulate high-sodium foods
• This contradicts the stated "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) agenda promoted by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who was appointed to health-related positions in the Trump administration

The Lobbying Connection:

According to The Lever's reporting, this provision came directly from lobbying efforts:

• Food industry lobbyists spent significant money on both the Trump administration and Democratic legislators
• The provision emerged after "lobbyists spent big on the Trump administration and Democratic defectors"
• The language was inserted by senators "quietly" to help their donors avoid compliance costs
• Specifically designed to "block rules to prevent food contamination and foodborne illnesses at farms and restaurants"

The Mechanism:

Rather than repealing the food safety laws outright (which would require public debate), the provision defunds enforcement. Because Republican donors opposed the regulations passed in 2015 and 2022, they lobbied to have language inserted that cuts the funds needed to enforce those laws, making them effectively void without the political cost of an open repeal fight.

Provision 3: Hemp and CBD Industry Destruction

Industry Scale:

The hemp and CBD industry represents a $28-30 billion sector of the American economy (sources vary between $20 billion and $28 billion in the reporting). This is a legally operating industry established by the 2018 Farm Bill.

Who Inserted It:

Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) personally inserted this provision at the last minute. This is particularly notable because:

• Kentucky has a significant hemp industry
• McConnell previously championed hemp farming in Kentucky
• McConnell promised to work toward protecting the hemp industry
• Despite these public positions, he "hamfisted" this provision into must-pass legislation

The Technical Details:

The provision makes it illegal for any hemp product to contain more than 0.4 milligrams of THC per container.

Why This Threshold Matters:

• Current hemp and CBD products typically contain trace amounts of THC even when designed purely for medical purposes
• Products sold for back pain, anxiety relief, epilepsy management, and other conditions would exceed this threshold
• Even products designed for pets (CBD for dogs) typically contain more than 0.4mg THC
• The threshold is so low that "nearly 100%" of currently legal hemp products would become illegal
• This includes products with no psychoactive effects whatsoever—pure CBD medical products

The Justification Given:

Supporters claimed the ban was necessary because "some bad actors are skirting the legal limits by enhancing the concentrations of THC in their products." However, the threshold set is far below what would be needed to address enhanced products—it eliminates virtually all legitimate medical CBD products.

Impact on Businesses and Families:

Individual business owner testimonies documented:

• "This will destroy my family's livelihood overnight"
• "It will destroy my livelihood and the livelihoods of our employees"
• One business owner (John Burke) reported it would "destroy 70% of his business"
• Hundreds of other businesses face similar destruction
• Families with special needs children who rely on CBD for medical management "will feel the effect"

Impact on Industry Workers:

The provision threatens to put "hundreds of thousands of people out of work" according to the analysis. The industry has grown substantially since the 2018 Farm Bill legalized hemp and CBD products.

Previous Legislative Battles:

Advocates had successfully fought off a hemp ban the previous year. One advocate (Sarah Fields) expressed frustration: "All the work we did to fight the hemp ban last year means nothing since they simply quietly snuck the ban into a funding bill. What is the point in making our voices heard if they find a way to get what they want one way or another?"

The Industry Competition Angle:

The provision was directly linked to lobbying from the alcohol industry:

Mitch McConnell's Alcohol Industry Funding:

• McConnell received nearly $900,000 from the beer, wine, and liquor industry
• These industries have "long lobbied to keep their biggest competitor, THC, off the shelves"
• The alcohol industry views hemp/CBD products as direct market competition

Democratic Complicity:

The analysis notes that "the biggest recipients on this list are Democrats"—referring to alcohol industry donations. This suggests the Democratic Party's long-standing reluctance to pursue marijuana/hemp legalization despite it being "an 8020 issue with the Democratic base" (meaning 80% support) may be connected to industry donations.

Health and Safety Comparison:

The analysis provides stark health comparisons:

• Alcohol kills 178,000 people annually in the United States alone
• The intoxication from alcohol "is literally your body dying"
• Alcohol is characterized as "a poison that kills you"
• Cannabis/hemp products: Zero documented deaths ever in history
• In seven years since the 2018 Farm Bill legalized CBD: no major side effects documented
• CBD has helped patients with epilepsy, cancer, and chronic pain "without any major side effects because again, it's perfectly safe"

Senator Rand Paul's Opposition:

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) was one of the few Republican senators who:

• Attempted to get this provision removed from the bill
• Voted against the CR specifically because of this provision
• Publicly criticized the provision in writing

His statement: "The government is open, but a hemp industry shutdown has just begun. In true Washington swamp fashion, this hemp bill is not being debated on its own. Once again, Congress created a crisis, then conveniently used the crisis to jam through new laws without debate."

Paul specifically noted: "This is so low that it takes away any benefit of the current products intended to manage pain or other conditions."

The Systemic Process Failure: Legislation Without Deliberation

The Pattern of Passage

The continuing resolution demonstrates a systematic abandonment of the founding principle that laws should be debated, understood, and refined before passage:

Before Passage:

• Bill characterized as "clean" with no additional provisions
• No public debate about the inserted provisions
• Provisions added anonymously without attribution
• Must-pass nature (government shutdown pressure) used to force acceptance
• Democratic leadership accepted the framing without thorough review

After Passage:

• Provisions not discovered until "days after the bill passed"
• Even legislators who voted for the bill were unaware of contents
• Mainstream media had not yet caught up to "just how much poison was stuffed into this thing"
• Individual citizens and business owners discovering provisions that directly harm them
• No accountability mechanism for anonymous additions

Why This Matters: The Crisis of Unread Legislation

This continuing resolution exemplifies a much larger crisis in American democratic governance. The pattern—passing must-pass legislation without reading it, allowing anonymous additions, discovering provisions only after passage—represents the complete inversion of what the American founders envisioned as legitimate lawmaking.

The Founding Vision vs. Current Reality:

The American system of self-governance was explicitly designed around deliberation before legislation. As articulated in the founding framework:

• Deliberation over impulse: Laws should not be passed in passion or panic, but after careful debate that considers consequences, alternatives, and objections
• Representation with accountability: Representatives carry the voice of citizens and can be replaced if they betray that trust—but this requires citizens knowing what their representatives actually voted for
• Supremacy of law: The entire system depends on laws that are debated, refined, and agreed upon before implementation, with the process mattering as much as the outcome

The CR process violated every one of these principles:

• Impulse over deliberation: The shutdown crisis created panic conditions where passage was rushed
• No meaningful accountability: Anonymous additions mean no one can be held responsible
• Process abandoned: Laws were passed without being read, provisions inserted without debate

The Educational Foundation That Makes This Possible

The founders understood that legitimate self-governance requires citizens educated in specific methodologies for evaluating information and holding leaders accountable. They envisioned citizens trained in what classical education called the Trivium method:

Grammar (Information Gathering):

• Ability to gather facts and identify what actually happened
• Distinguishing primary sources from secondary interpretation
• Asking: What is this bill? Who wrote these provisions? What do they actually do?

Logic (Analysis):

• Understanding processes and deriving meaning
• Testing arguments for consistency
• Asking: How do these provisions relate to government funding? Why were they added? What are the consequences?

Rhetoric (Ethical Communication):

• Persuasion grounded in factual accuracy and logical consistency
• Distinguishing between legitimate argument and manipulation
• Asking: Who benefits from these provisions? Why were they hidden? What is the purpose of the framing?

The Current Failure:

When legislators pass bills they haven't read, when media doesn't discover provisions until after passage, when citizens can't track anonymous additions, when the process is too complex for public understanding—the entire trivium framework breaks down:

• Grammar fails: The facts of what is being voted on are unknown
• Logic fails: Analysis becomes impossible when content is hidden
• Rhetoric fails: Communication becomes pure manipulation ("clean CR") rather than honest persuasion

The Consequence: Democratic Illegitimacy

As the founding framework articulates: "A stable society works when the rules are clear, the rewards are real, and the game feels fair. It fails when no one believes the game is worth playing."

The CR process demonstrates a system where:

• The rules are not clear (provisions discovered after passage)
• The rewards flow to hidden beneficiaries (eight senators, food industry donors, alcohol lobby)
• The game is not fair (anonymous additions, no debate, must-pass pressure)

When citizens discover that:

• Provisions directly harming their livelihoods were inserted secretly
• Food safety protections were removed without debate
• Senators created legal mechanisms to sue taxpayers for investigations
• All of this happened in a bill described as "clean" and "just business as usual"

...the result is exactly what the founders feared: citizens who "lose faith that following the rules leads to just outcomes" and see "others systematically advantaged by corruption or capture."

The Path Forward: Rebuilding Deliberative Governance

The solution is not primarily constitutional or procedural—it is educational. As the founding framework articulates:

"We can only return to the founding goal by returning to Education—not education as job training, but education as preparation for self-governance."

Specific Requirements:

1. Restoration of Deliberative Norms:
   • No bill passed without adequate time for review
   • All provisions attributed to specific legislators
   • Public debate on all additions to must-pass legislation
   • One issue at a time rather than omnibus packaging
2. Citizen Education in Legislative Analysis:
   • Teaching citizens to track bills through the legislative process
   • Understanding how provisions get added and by whom
   • Recognizing manipulation techniques (clean CR framing)
   • Holding representatives accountable for votes on unread legislation
3. Media Literacy:
   • Distinguishing between framing and reality
   • Recognizing when legislation is passed before being read
   • Understanding the difference between public debate and backroom deals
4. Institutional Reform:
   • Mechanisms to prevent anonymous additions
   • Mandatory waiting periods for review
   • Public access to bill text before votes
   • Consequences for legislators who vote without reading

The Stakes:

As Abraham Lincoln articulated: "We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

The continuing resolution demonstrates constitutional perversion:

• The legislative process (Article I) requires that Congress pass laws
• But legitimate lawmaking requires deliberation, debate, and understanding
• When Congress passes laws they haven't read, containing provisions added anonymously, serving interests never disclosed
• They are perverting the constitutional process while technically following its forms

Citizens must become "masters, not subjects"—but "mastery requires knowledge, discernment, and the courage to hold leaders accountable."

Without education in how to analyze legislation, how to track provisions, how to hold representatives accountable—citizens become "susceptible to those who pervert constitutional governance for personal power."

Documented Reactions and Political Implications

MAGA Coalition Internal Conflict

The provisions created significant backlash within the Republican base, particularly the libertarian-leaning segments:

Evan Kilgore (Libertarian MAGA): Characterized as "devastated by this bill," he stated: "The hemp provision in the appropriations package will destroy my family's livelihood overnight. It will destroy my livelihood and the livelihoods of our employees. It will destroy a 20 plus billion dollar industry that many Americans rely on as an alternative to big pharma. This hemp provision is an attack on the American people and it's an attack on me personally. The American dream is being destroyed by big business and lobbies."

The Realization: Analysis noted that "a lot of these MAGA losers are just now realizing this week that they voted to ruin their own lives." The characterization suggests that voters are discovering the consequences of supporting Republican leadership only after passage of legislation that directly harms them.

One advocate commented: "Dude, welcome to capitalist America"—suggesting that the systematic capture of government by business interests is finally becoming visible to those who previously supported the system.

Sarah Fields (Republican Advocate): Expressed deep frustration about the democratic process: "Just spoke with my friend John Burke. All the work we did to fight the hemp ban last year means nothing since they simply quietly snuck the ban into a funding bill. What is the point in making our voices heard if they find a way to get what they want one way or another?"

This statement captures the broader crisis: when citizen advocacy can be circumvented by inserting provisions into must-pass legislation without debate, democratic participation becomes meaningless.

Broader Political Observations

Bipartisan Corruption:

The analysis emphasizes that while Republicans inserted and passed these provisions, Democrats are also compromised:

• Democratic leadership accepted the "clean CR" framing without adequate scrutiny
• Top Democrats receive significant alcohol industry donations
• Democrats "have long dragged their feet on legalization despite it being like an 8020 issue with the Democratic base"
• Democratic "defectors" supported food safety deregulation after receiving industry money

The Hypocrisy of Priorities:

User Jaime Bonawitz captured the absurdity: "There are literal PDF files [pedophiles] in the White House and the Senate is out here trying to ban THC. The United States Senate is a fucking joke. A bunch of billionaire hacks."

The observation highlights the disconnect between stated moral priorities (pearl clutching about hemp/THC) and actual tolerance (defending credibly accused individuals in positions of power).

Midterm Election Implications

The analysis suggests the Trump administration has been "bleeding goodwill since they took office this year" and that the continuing resolution will accelerate this decline:

• Stopping people from using CBD products (nightly CBD gummies for pain, anxiety, sleep)
• While simultaneously feeding them contaminated food through deregulation
• Creating a situation where "I don't think [this] is going to win them any votes in the midterms"

The Systematic Pattern: Corporate Capture of Democratic Process

The Lobbying-Legislation Pipeline

The continuing resolution demonstrates the standard mechanism by which corporate interests capture democratic governance:

Step 1: Industry Opposition to Regulation

• Regulations passed (2015 FDA rule, 2022 traceability requirements, 2018 Farm Bill)
• Industries affected lobby against compliance costs
• Public health/safety considerations treated as business obstacles

Step 2: Campaign Contributions

• Targeted donations to key legislators
• Both parties receiving industry money (though analysis notes Democrats receive more alcohol industry money)
• McConnell receiving nearly $900,000 from beer, wine, and liquor industry

Step 3: Crisis Creation

• Government shutdown creates must-pass legislation situation
• Artificial deadline creates pressure to pass without review
• "Congress created a crisis, then conveniently used the crisis to jam through new laws without debate"

Step 4: Anonymous Provision Insertion

• Language written by or for industry lobbyists
• Inserted anonymously into must-pass bill
• No attribution means no accountability
• Framed as "clean" or "just business as usual"

Step 5: Passage Without Review

• Bill passed under shutdown pressure
• Legislators vote without reading
• Provisions discovered only after passage
• Media coverage comes days or weeks late

Step 6: Benefit Realization

• Industries avoid compliance costs (food safety)
• Competitors eliminated (hemp vs. alcohol)
• Legislators receive lawsuit payouts (eight senators)
• Public bears costs (contaminated food, lost industries, taxpayer-funded lawsuits)

Why This Violates Founding Principles

The founders explicitly designed the American system to prevent exactly this form of corporate capture:

The East India Company Warning:

The founders' experience with the East India Trading Company—a corporation so powerful it effectively governed territories and wielded military force—taught them that when government becomes owned or controlled by commercial interests, it ceases to serve the common good.

Government for the Common Good Meant:

• Public infrastructure that enables everyone to participate
• Constraint of monopoly to prevent domination
• Protection of the commons from private capture
• Voice for the voiceless in lawmaking
• Ensuring "the smallest voices of the People" could be heard

The Current Inversion:

The CR demonstrates the complete inversion of these principles:

• Infrastructure (food safety systems) dismantled to serve private interests
• Monopoly protection (alcohol industry eliminating hemp competition)
• Commons capture (public health sacrificed for industry profit)
• Voiceless excluded (hemp industry workers, families with special needs, consumers)
• Smallest voices drowned out (anonymous additions, no debate, no accountability)

As the founding framework states: "When government becomes owned or controlled by commercial interests, it ceases to serve the common good."

The Question of Legitimacy

The founding framework is explicit about what makes laws legitimate:

"Legitimate law required the consent of the governed, genuinely obtained."

When laws are passed that:

• Were not debated publicly
• Contain provisions added anonymously
• Serve interests that were never disclosed
• Harm citizens who had no opportunity to object
• Pass under crisis conditions that prevent review

...they fail the test of legitimacy. The consent of the governed cannot be "genuinely obtained" when the governed don't know what they're consenting to until after the fact.

Comparative Health Analysis: The Alcohol vs. Hemp Decision

The Public Health Data

Alcohol (Legal, Protected, Subsidized by Hemp Ban):

• 178,000 deaths annually in the United States alone
• The intoxication effect is "literally your body dying"
• Characterized accurately as "a poison that kills you"
• Well-documented health consequences across all organ systems
• Significant social costs (DUI deaths, domestic violence, addiction treatment)

Hemp/Cannabis (Being Effectively Banned):

• Zero documented deaths in all of recorded history
• Seven years of legal CBD use since 2018 Farm Bill with no major side effects
• Documented benefits for epilepsy, cancer pain management, anxiety, chronic pain
• Characterized as "perfectly safe" based on actual use data
• Used by families for children with special needs conditions

The Policy Incoherence

The continuing resolution makes the objectively more dangerous substance (alcohol) easier to produce with lower safety standards (contaminated water allowed), while effectively banning the substance with zero documented deaths and clear medical benefits.

This is not evidence-based policymaking. It is industry-captured policymaking where:

• The powerful industry (alcohol: $900,000 to McConnell alone) gets protection
• The competing industry (hemp: newer, smaller, less politically connected) gets eliminated
• Public health data is irrelevant to the decision
• The "Make America Healthy Again" rhetoric is revealed as empty

The Personal Cost

The analysis notes that alcohol killed "one of my dear friends just this year"—emphasizing that these are not abstract statistics but real human costs of prioritizing industry profits over public health.

Meanwhile, families with special needs children who rely on CBD for medical management, patients managing chronic pain without pharmaceutical side effects, and individuals using CBD as an alternative to addictive prescription medications all face the loss of these products because the alcohol industry doesn't want the competition.

The Broader Context: Democratic Backsliding and Institutional Decay

The Crisis of Faith in Democratic Processes

Sarah Fields's question captures the existential crisis: "What is the point in making our voices heard if they find a way to get what they want one way or another?"

When democratic participation becomes theater—when advocacy, public comment, legislative debate, and citizen organizing can all be circumvented by anonymous provisions in must-pass legislation—the entire legitimacy of the system comes into question.

The Founding Framework Warned of This:

"When people lose faith that following the rules leads to just outcomes, when they see others systematically advantaged by corruption or capture, the entire structure becomes vulnerable to demagogues who promise to smash the broken system."

The CR demonstrates:

• Rules don't lead to just outcomes (industry profits, public harm)
• Others systematically advantaged (eight senators, food/alcohol industries)
• System captured by corruption (anonymous additions, industry money)

This creates conditions where citizens become receptive to authoritarians who promise to bypass the corrupt system entirely—not understanding that the solution requires fixing the system's educational and procedural foundations, not abandoning constitutional governance.

The Educational Crisis Enables the Governance Crisis

Citizens cannot hold legislators accountable for voting on unread legislation if citizens themselves:

• Cannot track bills through the legislative process
• Don't understand how provisions get added
• Can't distinguish "clean CR" framing from hidden additions
• Lack the tools to analyze whether provisions serve the common good

The Trivium Gap:

Grammar: Citizens cannot gather accurate facts about what's in legislation when provisions are added anonymously and discovered only after passage.

Logic: Citizens cannot analyze the relationship between provisions and stated purposes when the framing ("clean CR") contradicts the reality (poison pills).

Rhetoric: Citizens cannot distinguish legitimate persuasion from manipulation when leaders describe bills as "incredible" while they contain provisions that harm constituents.

The Demagogue's Opportunity

The founding framework identifies demagogic tools:

• Evoking fear or resentment
• Drawing sharp divisions
• Undermining trust in institutions
• Amplifying misinformation
• Appealing to identity over ideas
• Little concern for nuance or truth

The CR provides perfect material for demagogues:

• Fear: "They're poisoning your food and destroying your livelihood"
• Division: "Corrupt DC insiders vs. real Americans"
• Institutional distrust: "The Senate is a fucking joke"
• Misinformation: Easy to make false claims when facts are hidden
• Identity: "MAGA coalition betrayed by establishment Republicans"
• No nuance: Complex bill reduced to "clean" vs. "poison"

The problem is that in this case, the demagogue's tools are being used to describe an actually corrupt process. The system genuinely is captured, the provisions genuinely were added in secret, the institutions genuinely are failing their basic functions.

This creates a crisis: How do you defend democratic institutions when they are actually failing? How do you promote faith in the process when the process is genuinely corrupt?

The Answer Is Not Defense—It's Reform:

The solution is not to defend the current broken process but to return to founding principles:

• Deliberation before legislation (no votes on unread bills)
• Attribution and accountability (no anonymous additions)
• One issue at a time (no omnibus packaging to hide provisions)
• Education for citizenship (trivium methodology to analyze governance)

Conclusion: The Choice Before Us

The "clean" continuing resolution of 2025 will likely be remembered as a minor legislative moment—a government funding bill that kept offices open for a few more months. But it should be remembered as something far more significant: a perfect distillation of how democratic governance fails when the educational and procedural foundations that make legitimate lawmaking possible are abandoned.

This was not a failure of constitutional design. The Constitution provides adequate mechanisms for legitimate lawmaking. This was a failure of constitutional practice—legislators voting on unread bills, provisions added anonymously, industry interests served secretly, citizens discovering consequences only after passage.

Two Paths Forward:

Path 1: Continued Decay

• More legislation passed without being read
• More anonymous provisions serving hidden interests
• More citizens discovering too late that their livelihoods are destroyed
• More faith lost in democratic processes
• More vulnerability to demagogues who promise to smash the system
• Eventual collapse into either chaos or authoritarianism

Path 2: Educational and Institutional Renaissance

• Return to deliberative norms (adequate review time, no anonymous additions)
• Citizen education in legislative analysis (trivium methodology)
• Accountability mechanisms (attribution requirements, consequences for unread votes)
• One issue at a time (end omnibus packaging)
• Process transparency (public access before votes)
• Restoration of faith through actual reform

The Founding Promise:

"Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives."

The continuing resolution demonstrates what happens when knowledge is deliberately obscured, when legislators don't read what they vote on, when provisions are added in secret, when citizens discover consequences too late.

The solution is not to abandon self-governance but to create citizens capable of it, educated in how to gather facts, analyze relationships, and communicate ethically. And to create institutions worthy of self-governing citizens, transparent, deliberative, accountable.

As the framework concludes:

"The founding vision is not dead. It merely awaits citizens worthy of it, educated, thoughtful, morally grounded, and committed to the arduous work of self-governance.

The question is not whether that ideal is achievable.

The question is whether we will do the work required to achieve it."

The continuing resolution of 2025 forces that question into sharp relief. The work begins with refusing to accept legislation passed without being read, provisions added without attribution, and governance conducted without genuine consent of the governed.

Appendix: Key Quotes and Sources

Legislative Process Critique

Rand Paul on the CR Process: "The government is open, but a hemp industry shutdown has just begun. In true Washington swamp fashion, this hemp bill is not being debated on its own. Once again, Congress created a crisis, then conveniently used the crisis to jam through new laws without debate."

Sarah Fields on Democratic Participation: "All the work we did to fight the hemp ban last year means nothing since they simply quietly snuck the ban into a funding bill. What is the point in making our voices heard if they find a way to get what they want one way or another?"

John Rose on Senator Lawsuit Provision: "I just introduced a bill to repeal the Senate's last-minute provision allowing senators to sue American taxpayers over Biden DOJ investigations, past or future. Two wrongs don't make a right."

Impact on Citizens

Evan Kilgore on Hemp Ban: "The hemp provision in the appropriations package will destroy my family's livelihood overnight. It will destroy my livelihood and the livelihoods of our employees. It will destroy a 20 plus billion dollar industry that many Americans rely on as an alternative to big pharma. This hemp provision is an attack on the American people and it's an attack on me personally. The American dream is being destroyed by big business and lobbies."

Jaime Bonawitz on Priority Incoherence: "There are literal PDF files [pedophiles] in the White House and the Senate is out here trying to ban THC. The United States Senate is a fucking joke. A bunch of billionaire hacks."

Investigative Sources

The Lever (David Sirota): "Senators quietly put language into the shutdown deal, helping their donors block rules to prevent food contamination and foodborne illnesses at farms and restaurants. The provision came amid an explosion of foodborne illnesses."

"After lobbyists spent big on the Trump administration and Democratic defectors, the government funding bill cut food contamination rules and limited ultraprocessed food research."

This analysis synthesizes multiple source materials to create a comprehensive understanding of how anonymous legislative additions to must-pass bills represent a systematic failure of democratic governance, one that can only be addressed through educational reform that prepares citizens for the active work of self-governance and institutional reform that restores deliberative norms to the legislative process.